Verification-first
Every answer carries a checkable source.
The industry's biggest fear is a confident, fabricated citation, the kind that gets attorneys sanctioned. Here is exactly how Lagelia checks every assertion against a real source, and surfaces the ones it can't.
Check any AI output against its source, instantly.
Generic chatbots hallucinate case citations and invent facts. Lagelia resolves every citation against a real corpus before it reaches you, and reports exactly what that check found. Trust, and verify.
A verdict is never inferred from how confident the model sounded. Three outcomes are possible, and the distance between them is the product.
Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015)
VerifiedVolume, reporter, and page confirmed against the corpus.
Flibber v. Jabberwock, 999 Q.Z.9th 123 (Atlantis 2024)
Not foundNo such authority exists. We wrote this one to prove the check runs.
Is this authority still good law?
Not checkedWe are not a citator. Confirm currentness in Shepard's or KeyCite before you rely on it.
An unverified citation is surfaced, never silently corrected, and it cannot leave the system wearing a verified badge.
How every citation is checked
Three steps between a question and an answer you can file.
Retrieve from your evidence
Every question runs against your matter documents and a verified legal corpus, not the open web and not a model's memory. If the source isn't in the record, it isn't used.
Cite to the pinpoint
Each assertion is bound to the page it rests on: a case, a deposition, an exhibit. The citation isn't decoration; it's the thing the claim is built on.
Verify, or surface the gap
Before you see it, every cite is checked back against its source. What can't be grounded is flagged as unverified. Lagelia says “I couldn't find support for this” instead of inventing it.
Confidence signals
One uniform signal, everywhere AI output appears.
Research, drafts, chronologies: every AI-produced statement wears the same badge, so the question “can I rely on this?” is answered at a glance, not buried in a disclaimer.
Open methodology
Trust is earned in the open.
We hold ourselves to a documented standard for how citations are retrieved, bound, and checked, and we publish it. A claim about accuracy that can't be inspected is just another confident assertion. Ours can be read.
See Lagelia on your own matter.
Bring a live case. We'll demo on your actual facts, documents, and deadlines, and show you exactly how the next 90 days of work change.
Request a demo